S.C. Forestry Commission
Results of 2010 SPB Pheromone Survey

June 2010

We have completed the 2010 Southern Pine Beetle (SPB) pheromone trapping.

Trapping Results (pdf)

Map Predictions (pdf)

Past Surveys (pdf)

A total of 27 S.C. counties were trapped for SPB in 2010 using protocol devised by Billings, et al. This protocol includes monitoring three (3) pheromone traps in each county for a 28-day period during early spring.  In Charleston and Georgetown counties only 1 trap was active. Insects captured in each trap are returned to the laboratory for analysis. The total number of SPB for each trap is determined as well as the percentage of SPB to clerid beetles. Since clerid beetles are major predators of SPB, the percentage of clerid beetles trapped is factored into insect population projections. Based on this trapping, a population prediction trend is determined for each county. In the past, such surveys have had a success rate of over 80% in predicting the degree of SPB infestation during the following summer. Last year we predicted that losses could occur in one (1) county, Abbeville. Although we had beetle activity in many counties, it was at low levels.

We predict none of the counties trapped this year to experience a severe Southern Pine Beetle outbreak. This is the same prediction as last year. This year Oconee county trapped sufficient beetles receive a prediction of static – moderate pine mortality. In this county, we can expect a few scattered beetle spots. The other 28 counties we sampled had few beetles trapped and are not expected to have widespread problems. These counties include Abbeville, Anderson, Beaufort, Charleston, Cherokee, Chester, Colleton, Dorchester, Edgefield, Fairfield, Georgetown, Greenville, Greenwood, Hampton, Horry, Jasper, Kershaw, Lancaster, Laurens, Lexington, McCormick, Newberry, Pickens, Richland, Saluda, Spartanburg, Union, and York. This trapping information is presented in tabular form later in this report.

Statewide, the number of Southern Pine Beetles trapped increased by 73% from last year’s total and the number of clerids increased slightly by 12%. This clerid population is still high and should constrain SPB development in most areas, including those with some predicted beetle activity.   

In the piedmont, Oconee County has experienced very low level of SPB activity for the last several years. We expect the clerids will continue to hold the SPB level down and beetle spots that occur should spread slowly and be fairly easy to control.

In the coastal plain counties, we trapped very few beetles. The low trap levels of this year indicate unfavorable conditions for SPB development. Historically, outbreaks in the coastal plain occur shortly after climatological changes. The change is usually from drought to excess soil moisture. This pattern of precipitation has occurred during the last few years, and some pines have been dying. However, in most locations, the culprits have been either Black Turpentine beetles or Ips engraver beetles.  There were several small Southern Pine Beetle spots last year several coastal counties.

These trapping data results are for entire counties and there is always the possibility of sporadic and localized beetle activity in counties with overall predictions of low population levels. Activity is most likely in susceptible pine stands that are overstocked, overmature or stagnant, have poor drainage or have littleleaf, annosus, or other root diseases present and causing stress.

We will be conducting aerial surveys in all South Carolina counties this summer. In the unlikely event of significant beetle activity, we will fly 100% surveys and notify affected landowners that beetle spots are present on their properties.

As mentioned above, Ips and Black Turpentine Beetles continue to cause mortality in overstocked stands and in areas where excessive rainfall coupled with impermeable hardpan caused some drowning of roots. A summer drought was also responsible for some stress that led to attack by these less aggressive beetles. Since these insects require different control tactics than SPB, it is important to determine which insect is causing each infestation. Ips beetles are identifiable by their galleries that are usually H or I shaped rather than the winding galleries of Southern Pine Beetles. Adult Ips beetles also eject the frass from their galleries while the SPB packs its galleries with frass. Black Turpentine Beetles attack the basal portions of the trunk and are a much slower killer than SPB or Ips. We can assist with this identification or provide training where needed. Last summer we evaluated multiple stands that were harvested due to Ips and Black Turpentine Beetle activity.

In summary, most of South Carolina can expect a year of no to minimal loss to southern pine beetle and related bark beetles. However, Oconee County may be poised for some degree of loss, especially if we have additional stress factors. Control by commercial salvage is effective in stopping any of the bark beetles infesting pines. Another possibility for control of Southern Pine Beetle only is the cut and leave technique. In this control strategy, infested trees and a buffer of apparently uninfested pines are cut but not necessarily salvaged. This method works best from May – October due to high daytime temperatures and SPB biological factors. This is not effective for Ips or BTB spots since those insects breed and mature easily in cut pines or stumps.

It is difficult to predict the degree of loss to SPB since environmental factors affect this. However, our best guess for S.C. for 2010 is for a loss of less than one million dollars. As usual, a hot summer with extended temperatures over 100 degrees Fahrenheit should constrain SPB development.

Please contact us if you have any questions or if we can provide additional information.

 

Some links on this page require Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you don't have Acrobat Reader you can get it free from Adobe Systems Inc. Get Acrobat Reader Adobe(R) Acrobat(R) Copyright © 2010 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.

 


Insect and Disease